. Book of the Month

I know it's only the 8th of March, but I finished reading this month's book, and let's face it, you're not going to read it. You didn't read Candide, and you didn't read The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo, unless you are Oliver, and then you probably just fell asleep again on page 16.

So why don't I just get it over with.

This month's book, as you recall, is "The Book of Genesis Illustrated by R. Crumb"

R. Crumb is famous for his underground comix.


He has also made more "serious" books.



"The Book of Genesis Illustrated by R. Crumb" is a comic book version of the first book of the Bible. Which is a lot of stuff.


I like that God is all crazy looking with wild hair and mad staring eyes, because God was pretty crazy in the beginning.


I'm sure I would not have read the Bible if it didn't come with cool pictures, although it turns out I already knew all the basic stories in Genesis from those interminable mornings at Clifton Methodist Church Sunday School.

The Creation


Adam and Eve

Noah's Ark


Abraham and Isaac


Joseph and his Technicolour Dreamcoat


There's also a lot of sex and a lot of violence, which they tend to gloss over in Sunday School.


And then there are some surprises.

For example, after the flood, when the ark is safely parked on dry land, Noah grows a vineyard, gets blind drunk, and passes out naked in his tent. It is not clear whether he was drinking while naked, or gets drunk first and then gets naked, but however it transpires, he is unconscious on the floor with it all hanging out when his youngest son stops by. The boy sees his father's exposed manhood, and because of that, Noah turns him into a slave.

People were living for about 900 years back then. And this was Noah's youngest son. So say he was about 200 years old. That's 700 years of slavery for accidentally looking at his drunk dad's dong. Seems a bit mean to me.

Actually slavery in general seems a bit mean to me. God seems to have been okay with it.

And what is the lesson there? Do not under any circumstances ever, ever look at your pissed pop's penis, or suffer centuries of familial servitude?

And then there's Jacob's two wives, the sisters Rachel and Leah, who have a comedic baby-making competition. It's hard to keep count, but I think Leah wins 9 to 3 - although 4 of the children are born to the sisters' slaves who are also dragged into the contest.

And there are some dull bits. Characters have a habit of describing what they plan to do, describing it again as they do it, and then describing to someone else what they've just done. And there is way too much blah about who begot who and where they moved after they'd been begotten.

In the back of the book, Crumb offers possible explanations for some of the more confusing passages in Genesis (such as why men keep pretending their wives are their sisters). One proposition is that some texts in Genesis were based on older stories from a more matriarchal period of history, which were then "twisted around to fit the later patriarchal paradigm."

I'm boring you, aren't I? You've stopped reading this. You're just skimming to the end to see if there are any more pictures of tits and bums.

I understand.

Well, I enjoyed it very much. Except for the begotting.

As always, I very much look forward to hearing your opinion.

Next month we will be reading The Wapshot Chronicle by John Cheever.

Order yours today!